~ after careful consideration, we at the angry red planet have decided: if there is an unprovoked military strike iraq before november, we will cast our votes in the upcoming election against any incumbent candidate in any office regardless of their position on the action. if they support it, then the vote against them is for obvious reasons; if they oppose the action, then the vote is against their empirically evident torpidity and complacency. if the strike comes after november, then we will be sure to remember to vote against incumbents in the following election.

however, since our standard policy is to vote against all incumbents regardless of circumstances, we wonder how much the revelation of our decision will affect the industrial military strategy.

~ while the angry red planet continues to fail to deliver news on a timely schedule, check out the following articles…

gore vidal, composer of burr, has penned a rather angry article, ‘democratic vistas‘, for the nation. he addresses the u.s. presidential election debacle which some readers may remember hearing about last november.

also, freaking sony has unveiled some details concerning the new spider-man film; these details can be seen at hollywood.com. i don’t know if i can stand another movie adaptation of a comic book that must start at the beginning of the series; if there is a civilian out there who does not know that peter parker’s complacency led to his uncle’s death and the subsequent drive of spider-man‘s heroism, then he or she does not belong at the theater with the fans. we got enough of the questions about telepathy vs. telekinesis from the new x-men ‘fans’; i don’t look forward to a future of questions of the likes: ‘so spider-man used to be venom?’

~ thesis quote: ‘i’ve been working on my thesis all day‘

~ if you are in the los angeles area at 13:00 today, stop by the angry red planet thesis review. look for it in the ‘lecture trailer’?

~ november posts have been added to the archive.

~ ‘does anybody really know what time it is?’ :
he conversationally tells her one thing behind my back; i heedlessly tell her about another thing behind his back; she cunningly asks her for some thing behind my back;

she vengefully tells her one more thing behind his back. i wish someone would tell me how to explain ‘truth’ to someone whose self-worth relies on forcing others into remorse and to someone who has used the term ‘love’ more times in november than i did in the 90’s.